Pam Casale vs Barbara Hallquist Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Casale vs B. Hallquist

Pam Casale

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Barbara Hallquist

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Casale 1 - 0 Hallquist

They have played 4 sets in total, with Pam Casale winning 4 and Barbara Hallquist winning 0. The last match between Pam Casale and Barbara Hallquist was at the Wimbledon Plate, 29-06-1981, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Pam Casale getting the victory 6-2 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Casale	1
Hallquist	0

Last H2H Matches:

() Wimbledon Plate(06-29-81)

Stats

Pam Casale

Barbara Hallquist

(F) Bakersfield Futures(03-09-81)

Stats

Pam Casale

Barbara Hallquist

P. Casale vs B. Hallquist H2H Profile

P. Casale	Stats	B. Hallquist
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
54.40% (210-176)	Career Total W/L	47.32% (106-118)
1	Grass	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Casale vs B. Hallquist Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pam Casale has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Barbara Hallquist has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pam Casale, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Barbara Hallquist has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Pam Casale has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barbara Hallquist has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Pam Casale has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Barbara Hallquist winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Pam Casale has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 60/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Barbara Hallquist has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 22% (W/L 2/ 7).
Player level: In the last year, Pam Casale has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Barbara Hallquist has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Pam Casale winning 2 times and Barbara Hallquist being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Pam Casale winning 4 and Barbara Hallquist winning 0. The last match between Pam Casale and Barbara Hallquist was at the Wimbledon Plate, 29-06-1981, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Pam Casale getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pam Casale has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Barbara Hallquist has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pam Casale has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barbara Hallquist has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Pam Casale has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barbara Hallquist has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Pam Casale vs Barbara Hallquist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Casale vs B. Hallquist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Casale	Stats	B. Hallquist
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
24	Games Won	13
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Casale Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Chicago - 23-09-1991
Q1 Julie StevenJ. Steven	L	6-2 5-7 6-2	Stats
ITF Lady Lake - 10-06-1991
R3 Lisa SeemannL. Seemann	W	3-6 6-1 6-1	Stats
SF Aurora GimaA. Gima	L	7-5 7-5	Stats
R4 Sandra CacicS. Cacic	W	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Beverly BowesB. Bowes	W	6-0 3-6 5-2 RET	Stats

View All

B. Hallquist Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bakersfield - 26-09-1983
R3 Ann HenrickssonA. Henricksson	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Tokyo Queens - 12-09-1983
R4 Andrea JaegerA. Jaeger	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
R3 Patricia Hy BoulaisP. Hy	W	6-3 7-5	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 30-08-1983
R1 Marcela SkuherskaM. Skuherska	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Manhattan Beach - 08-08-1983
R3 Virginia RuziciV. Ruzici	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Casale vs B. Hallquist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Casale	Stats	B. Hallquist
54.40% (210/176)	YTD Win/Loss	47.32% (106/118)
54.29% (475/400)	Sets Win/Loss	47.58% (246/271)
52.29% (4086/3728)	Games Win/Loss	48.50% (2309/2452)
57.02% (65/49)	Hard Win/Loss	50.63% (40/39)
58.25% (60/43)	Clay Win/Loss	22.22% (2/7)
43.28% (29/38)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.75% (14/18)
50.00% (13/13)	Grass Win/Loss	47.92% (23/25)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
310.28	Average Opponent Rank	214.2
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	33.33% (2/4)
65.63% (21/11)	Challenger W/L	51.52% (17/16)
50.00% (28/28)	Futures W/L	37.04% (10/17)
54% (208/382)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (106/222)
100% (2/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
67% (6/9)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
47% (49/104)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (37/68)
86% (217/187)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (105/91)
14% (217/30)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (105/14)
14% (168/23)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (119/16)